A personal message from Captain Bruce Dickinson
Dear 666 passenger,
I am gutted to have to tell you that Astraeus Airlines have been forced to remove the Iron Maiden decals (artwork transfers) from the Boeing 757 and that its now highly unlikely that operational proceedures will allow enough time to have the Ed Force One livery reinstated for my Bruce Air trips.
When we originally commissioned the 757 from Astraeus it was due to be reverted back to their normal airline branding at the end of the first leg of our tour. However Astraeus were getting such great feedback from passengers and airports around our tour, that they asked if they could retain the Iron Maiden decals when they took the plane back for their own normal charter flights. We thought this was great and it has since been flying European and Middle East routes with spectacular reaction.
Unfortunately for us, ‘Ed Force One’ was the only plane available from the Astraeus fleet to fly a new and regular route into and out of an African country on a recent new route. The striking Iron Maiden imagery had a violent reaction from the locals as they regarded the artwork, particularly that of Eddie, as very bad ju ju. Not only would local passengers refuse to board the plane because of the artwork, but other passengers were refusing to board planes of other airlines parked nearby in case they were tainted by the evil spirits! This resulted in some furore among the attending passengers and even more among the airlines involved! As the liveried 757 is owned and maintained by Astraeus, they had no alternative but to strip off all the Iron Maiden artwork and return the plane to its usual livery to be able to continue on the new route .
As most seats on these trips were taken up before I announced that we would be using Ed Force One (Warsaw/Prague was already sold out), I really hope this isn’t too much of a disappointment to you, and I much look forward to welcoming you aboard Bruce Air Flight AEU 666.
The team at ICT will keep you advised of any developments.
Best wishes,
Bruce
They are the British heavy metal band that wouldn’t lie down. Iron Maiden formed in London’s East End in 1975, but they really became the enduring 100 million-selling heroes of the new wave of British heavy metal with the arrival of singer Bruce Dickinson in 1981.
Metal’s original renaissance man, Dickinson, 49, is a published novelist, film- maker, qualified pilot and was once ranked the seventh-best Brit in the sport of fencing.
Twenty-seven years after Bruce’s maiden voyage, the band, flying in the face of fashion and business expectations, are more popular than ever. They are currently touring to promote the Somewhere Back In Time compilation which recently introduced new listeners to their classic metal legacy.
“We’ve just come through Canada and they are much closer to the Brits in audience reaction than the Americans,” says Bruce, taking a break between shows on the US leg of their tour.
“They’re familiar with football chants. Americans don’t get going in quite the same way. They wave their fists in the air a lot and go ‘woo hoo’, whereas the Canadians do a big chant of ‘Maiden, Maiden’.”
But no matter how the audience reaction changes, Iron Maiden stay the same.
“That’s one of the reasons we’re now bigger than ever,” smiles Bruce, “whereas a lot of bands and people in general worry about what others think of them and change accordingly.
“We don’t because we’ve never really cared what others think. We always thought that if people don’t like it, that’s tough – we’ll just have to do it for a smaller audience. But the opposite has proved the case.”
Indeed, Maiden can sell 50,000 tickets in the unlikely venue of Bogota, Colombia. So does Bruce have any explanation for Maiden’s phenomenal popularity?
“I think it’s a variety of things,” he muses. “We started a whole new generation of metal bands and there aren’t too many originals around. The Stones – bless ’em – are certainly one, and I’ll be very happy if we are still running round like them at 65.
“With the internet, bands can come and go every five minutes and the music looks disposable. Maiden represents something that’s not disposable.”
Many thought the band peaked in the early 1990s, but the box office returns for their last two tours have been the biggest of their career. “The thing that energises us as a band is looking out on the floor and seeing a whole bunch of kids jumping around,” Bruce grins.
With their mascot Eddie, British flag and opening speech from Sir Winston Churchill, Maiden’s traditional British values aren’t in question. Don’t such aspects ever seem old-fashioned to him?
“Not really,” counters Bruce. “You have to put things in context. The Churchill speech is relevant because the song we attached it to – Aces High – is about the Battle Of Britain. We bring out the Union Jack for The Trooper because it’s the story of The Charge Of The Light Brigade – a great British military disaster.
“The stories we tell aren’t about glorifying the event but rather the heroism of the people that fought it. It’s a guy thing, but guys are fascinated by war because it takes in the best and worst of mankind.”
From their earliest success to their current in-demand global status, Maiden are very much a people’s band.
“We literally wouldn’t exist without our fans,” admits Bruce. “Press and radio don’t give us much of a leg up. Same with MTV. Fortunately, we get a lot of kids saying let’s go and see Maiden.”
For the band’s homecoming show at Twickenham, Bruce will cycle the short distance from his house to the famous stadium.
“I’m trying to be as green as I can,” he says. “As an airline pilot I have a carbon footprint that’s a size 10, so it’s pretty hard. Twickenham is a great stadium and the sound is much better than at Wembley because it’s so self-contained.
“Rod, our manager, is a massive rugby fan, so he’s leaping around excited about drinking in the bar, walking the hallowed turf and jumping in the team bath. There’ll be our biggest firework show ever with fireballs and gas bombs, and we want to make sure of a good sound so we are bringing in a lot of extra equipment.”
These days, he’s happily married with three kids, but Bruce enjoyed the excesses of rock ’n’ roll during Maiden’s early career.
“We were a bunch of 24-year-olds from England going round America in the 1980s,” he laughs. “What do you think went on? We weren’t vicars, but at the same time we’re not daft. Nobody was married, nobody got hurt and we’re all still here to talk about it.
“We’re proud of the fact that we’re fit, healthy, drink beer and have a laugh.”
Director and co-screenwriter Julian Doyle will be in NY to attend a sneak showing of the film, and to answer questions at the end of the film.
The showing will be held at Two Boots Pioneer Theatre for a midnight screening, 12:00 for 12:15 start on Sunday 15th June (technically morning of Monday 16th June)
The Two Boots Pioneer Theater is located at:
155 East 3rd Street (between Avenues A and B) - New York, New York
(212) 591-0434
http://www.twoboots.com/pioneer/
advance tickets: click by showtime or call (800) 595 4849 (service charges apply)
Click here for a map
Subways and buses:
- F or V train to Lower East Side / Second Avenue. Exit toward 1st Avenue. Walk north (away from Houston) to 3rd street, then east just past Avenue A to 155 East 3rd.
- 9 or 21 bus to Houston Street and Avenue A. Walk north to 3rd Street. Turn east and go a few doors down to 155 East 3rd.
- 14A bus to 3rd street and Avenue A.
The 8 and 15 buses also come relatively close, as do these trains: 6 (Bleecker Street station), B and D (Grand Street), JMZ (Delancey / Essex), and L (1st Ave).
Click here for the location of the nearest parking lot
Tickets: $10.00, $6.50 members. indicated.
Jack Parsons was a brilliant chemist, member of Cal Tech propulsion unit that invented of the rocket fuel used for the US space flight to the moon. He was also a fanatical believer in the Magyck of Aleister Crowley the aging occultist who considered himself ‘The Beast’ incarnate.
In 1947 Jack Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard were performing Crowley’s mystic rituals in a house in Pasadena, California. Parsons wrote excitedly to his occult leader, Crowley: “I have had the most devastating experience of my life. I have been in direct touch with One who is most Holy and Beautiful as mentioned in your ‘Book of the Law’. First instructions were received through Lafayette Ron Hubbard the seer. I have followed them to the letter. There was a desire for incarnation. I am to act as an instructor, guardian, guide for nine months; then it will be loosed on the world…”
Crowley wrote despairingly to a disciple about Parsons: “It appears that he has given away both his girl and his money to this writer of science fiction and is now invoking my ritual to produce a MOONCHILD. I am fairly frantic…”
Nine months later while being visited by two students from Cambridge, Aleister Crowley died of cardiac degeneration. Missing from his personal possessions was his magical diaries and his pocket-watch. His funeral took place in the Chapel of the Brighton Crematorium. The final rites were performed by the novelist Louis Marlowe reading extracts from Crowley’s ‘Book of the Law’. The Brighton Echo denounced the whole ceremony as a Black Mass.
In 1952 Jack Parsons was blown up in his laboratory in Pasadena. L. Ron Hubbard died on his yacht as leader of the Church of Scientology. But did the issue end with these three deaths? Would Crowley, as he claimed, ever return from death to rule the world? Why did US astronauts name a crater on the moon after Jack Parsons? Is L. Ron Hubbard really dead? What had been generated by the ceremony in California that seemed to signal Crowley’s demise? And what happened to the missing pocket-watch?
Unanswered questions till, late in the twentieth century, Dr. Joshua Mathers brought a ’state of the art ‘Interactive Suit’ from Cal Tech California to Cambridge in England to begin an experiment that, unknown to mankind, changed the course of our planet.
ISBN: 978-1906510-909
Read the Press Release - (Adobe Acrobat Reader Required)
Read the advance information on this book - (Adobe Acrobat Reader Required)
You can buy the book from Amazon.com by clicking below:
Singer Bruce Dickinson explains how the British metal gods still attract teenage metalheads by the tens of thousands.
To keep the excitement level high, he says, “we just, you know, play a bit less.”
Iron Maiden’s touring schedule is never very full, typically sporting only a handful of stateside dates each time out, and often with a conceit attached, from The Early Days Tour, focusing strictly on material from the band’s first four albums … to 2006’s trek behind the hailed return-to-form “A Matter of Life and Death,” when the group would play the album in its entirety … to this season’s Somewhere Back in Time Tour, devoted to reviving the bulk of the band’s 1984 World Slavery Tour, complete with a wilder pyrotechnic display and the most gigantic Eddie (Maiden’s skeletal mascot) ever assembled.
“When we looked back at the `Live After Death’ DVD,” Dickinson recalls, “the big Eddie at the back that comes out … we said, `Oh, well, let’s just build it the same as we did before.’ And then we found the measurements of it, and we went, `Yeah, that’s pretty small. We can’t do that. We’ve got to at least double the size of it.’ So now it is absolutely monstrous.”
So big, in fact, that a special hydraulic cherry-picker has to be flown with the band in order to lift it.
Could be stunts like that that keep attracting fresh-faced fans. Or it could also be that while so many of Maiden’s peers and progeny have faded out or lost their edge after an album or two, these British veterans - including founding members Steve Harris (bass) and Dave Murray (guitar), drummer Nicko McBrain and guitarists Adrian Smith and Janick Gers, all in their early 50s - have soldiered on, surviving a rocky `90s to re-emerge this decade as one of the enduring masters of the form.
I caught up with Dickinson, 49, by phone while Maiden was in final rehearsals after touching down in Texas, and I began by wondering the same thing I do of all global phenomena: Great though both highs must be, it must feel different to play for 30,000 Californians across two nights in Irvine than it would to encounter 45,000 people all at once in Bogota, or 50,000-plus most anywhere across Europe.
But … how is it different, exactly?
Well, it doesn’t so much go geographically, but it is different from place to place. Over the years, it’s strange how places have taken on different characteristics.
When we first started coming to America 25 years ago, we always used to imagine that the West Coast was the laid-back one, and the East Coast was where it was really happening. But certainly for the last 10 years, we were doing shows in Los Angeles and going, “Man, what a great gig!” The audience reaction is just really in-your-face, and they’re really attentive and listening and informed. It was just really spectacular. I would say, actually, that the West Coast is one of our favorite places to play in North America at the moment.
Well, you have some history here, of course. (Maiden’s widely regarded 1985 live album “Live After Death” and its companion video, finally released on DVD in February, was captured across four nights at Long Beach Arena in 1984.) Do you have specific memories of those shows that stand out the most?
Well, it was just a gorgeous summer. It was a time when metal and rock music were really at a peak, culturally speaking. After “Live After Death,” to be honest with you, I think the sort of hair bands, and one or two of the more embarrassing episodes in metal history that happened around then, tended to take over a bit in the public perception. Which was a shame, `cause of course we were still doing the same thing. And we’re still here doing the same. So we must be doing something right.
How would you characterize metal now?
It’s kinda come full circle. Except, of course, that now more than ever the audience own the music, because of the Internet and downloads and things like that. Audiences have such a choice now. But because of that, it’s really heartening when you see your ticket sales going through the roof. And with no radio advertising, no TV - we don’t even have a record out. Well, we do now …
But it’s a greatest-hits record (”Somewhere Back in Time: The Best of 1980-1989″).
Yeah, and it’s designed - completely designed - to capitalize on people that are new to the band, who need some kind of reference to know what to dip into first. In effect, what we’re looking at is a global phenomenon that is caused by word-of-mouth, and it’s pretty unprecedented.
It does seem that way. When I saw you … I noticed the crowd was astonishingly young. To see 15-, 16-, 17-year-old kids … other bands who have been around as long or longer than you don’t draw like that. What accounts for it?
The heartening thing is that it’s happening in America now. This is what’s been going on in Canada for ages, and it’s what we expect in Europe and South America. When we go into a country and 45,000 people show up in Colombia, 30,000 in Costa Rica … we don’t even have a record company in Costa Rica. These are not old, die-hard fans. These are people who are seeing us for the first time.
And a lot of them are very, very young, which is great, because with all respect to old rockers, they don’t put out like 16-year-old kids. You know, they sit there and nod their heads sagely and ruminate - and they enjoy it for sure. But they don’t really start leaping up and down and head-banging and taking their clothes off and sweating buckets. They’d end up in hospital.
But with kids and us … it’s like feeding the hurricane. You need those warmer-temperature waters to keep the hurricane fed. We get our energy from the audience, and we fire it right back at them.
Some of why you’re so popular with younger listeners must have something to do with older brothers and even parents handing down records. But I think a lot of it also has to do with metal now bearing so much of your influence.
Yeah, I think a lot of the bands that are around now will all name-check us as being a major influence. Because, you know, we went out and we did things our own way. We went, “Screw the Establishment, we don’t care about radio, we just want to rock the way we want to do it.”
You continue to do that.
Exactly. But the thing I’m really proud of is that the stuff we’ve been doing really stands up to scrutiny. So many of the bands now - the young bands coming up - are much heavier than we are. We don’t have a problem with that - we’re not gonna try to out-heavy them or anything else like that. We just do what we do.
Yeah, but you out-sing the majority of them. I think there’s good new metal, fine, but there’s also just a lot of growling and screaming now.
Look, I’m not gonna diss people’s choices. People choose to sing that way, and audiences choose to buy it. They enjoy it. My son is in a band, and he’s a singer, and his vocals … they’re screaming-growling stuff … and he’s got a pretty reasonable voice. Yet he practices really hard to get the screaming-growling thing without losing that voice every five minutes. So I’m, like, “Hats off to you.” And then I go along to see him at gigs, and I’m like, “OK, I get this.” It’s not how I would sing it. But I get it, within the terms of reference.
At the same time, all the kids in his band are really into Maiden. They love it because of what it represents and its heritage, but also because of what we do right now. So many of these kids who are into the band now have gotten into us during the last five years. Effectively, that means that they’ve been listening not only to our heritage albums - if even that - but to the new stuff we’ve been putting out.
Perhaps, but they must be hoping to recapture some part of your past, too.
Oh, one of the main reasons this tour has seized young people’s attentions in particular is that they have no idea what it was like when Maiden played “Rime of the Ancient Mariner” back then - but they would have given their eyeteeth to have been there.
And now we’re offering them that opportunity. Not by doing kind of a pastiche or facsimile of the World Slavery Tour. But we are bringing those songs back to life with more experience than we did in 1984. Everything in 1984 sounded like we were really in a hurry to get to the end, `cause we were just excited, and still pretty young. We’d come on stage and play everything at twice the speed.
Now, as we’ve gone down the slippery slope of doing this for umpteen years, we have the confidence to give our songs the power they really deserve. A lot of bands along the way lose the excitement level, `cause they’ve been doing it for years. So they get really good at delivering music that kids are gonna look upon and go, “Yeah, but they look kinda bored.” (Laughs.)
You look anything but bored.
We figured this out a while back. How do we stop this happening to us? `Cause all of us would be really disappointed with ourselves if that happened. And we thought, well, don’t play too much. Treat this as a huge privilege. Treat it like when kids get together and they’re in a band, and they’ve got their first three or four gigs - each gig is just like the first time you do a world tour, `cause it’s so exciting.
So to keep that excitement, we just, you know, play a bit less. And we leave gaps in between. That gives us time to recover physically, but more importantly, mentally. It keeps that excitement level there.
That also helps keep a mystique going.
Of course, once you go out, like when we did the initial part of the tour and we played in L.A. and we played in New York … I mean, you could tell the sort of seismic ripples that went through on the Internet after we played L.A. That went all the way through North America. Kids were e-mailing going, “God, you should have seen it, it was awesome, they were fantastic.” The business on this tour … we’ve never done business like this for years and years and years in North America. It’s really, really cool.
I think part of why you endure is that your music has added resonance, especially now. I think your last album reflected our times very heavily.
I think “A Matter of Life and Death” is one of the best albums Maiden has ever made. It stands up to all of our best from the `80s. I’m immensely proud of that album, and funnily enough, it was critically quite well-received. But even if it hadn’t been, what mattered is not so much what the critics say. What matters is what happens when people listen to it and go, “Wow, this is anything but an old and tired band.”
It’s highly entertaining, schlocky stuff with the bits of pop science thrown in (”I feel like Schroedinger’s Cat” etc) giving it even more of a b-movie feel. It might not be quite enough to forgive Bruce for ‘Bring Your Daughter To The Slaughter’ but it does make you wonder if there’s anything the singer, jet pilot and champion fencer can’t do.
- Trevor Baker, Rocksound.
Click the ‘read more’ link below to read more reviews
Warner music Entertainment release the Chemical Wedding Soundtrack album in the UK today, Monday 26th May.
The CD, which is an eclectic musical cocktail, includes tracks from Iron Maiden and Bruce Dickinson, the original film score, dialogue excerpts and epic classical pieces. It is structured so as to tell the story of the film from diabolical beginning to demonic end.
The original score was written by Bruce Dickinson, Dave Howman, Andre Jaquemin, and Rod Melvin, and can be bought from Play.com, What Records and all good record shops.

The full musical track listing runs :-
1. CHEMICAL WEDDING - BRUCE DICKINSON
2. MEET THE WICKEDEST MAN IN THE WORLD - GEOFF BRETON & SEAN REA
3. HUSH, HUSH, HUSH, HERE COMES THE BOGEY MAN (Remastered) - HENRY HALL
4. YOUNG SYMONDS & YOUNG ALEX MEET CROWLEY - GEOFF BRETON, SEAN REA & JOHN SHRAPNEL
5. 50 YEARS I KEPT HIS WATCH - PAUL MCDOWELL
6. THE SUIT REVEALED (Score)
7. THE EVIL THAT MEN DO LIVES ON - THOMAS NELSTROP
8. MATHERS’ DREAM (Score)
9. SEXUAL MAGIC - SIMON CALLOW & JUD CHARLTON
10. AN ENCOUNTER WITH HIM - SIMON CALLOW & JUD CHARLTON
11. LIA MEETS MATHERS (Score)
12. SYMONDS INTRODUCES DR OLIVER HADDO - PAUL MCDOWELL
13. MESSIAH : PART 2 “HALLELUJAH” - HANDEL
14. HADDO’S LECTURE - SIMON CALLOW
15. SYMPHONY NO.40 IN G MINOR K550 : I MOLTO ALLEGRO - MOZART
16. HADDO’S EXPLANATION - SIMON CALLOW, RICHARD FRANKLIN & ROBERT ASHBY
17. THOSE COCKLESS WONDERS - SIMON CALLOW & LUCY CUDDEN
18. WHO IS IT YOU THINK I AM - SIMON CALLOW & JUD CHARLTON
19. CAN I PLAY WITH MADNESS - IRON MAIDEN
20. PROFESSOR IN SUIT THE JOURNEY - KAL WEBBER, JUD CHARLTON, TERRENCE BAYLER & JAMIE LISA JACQUEMIN
21. EVERY MAN & WOMAN IS A STAR - SIMON CALLOW
22. FANLIGHT FANNY - GEORGE FORMBY
23. HADDO VISITS THE MYSTIC SHOP - SIMON CALLOW & LILLY DUMONT
24. THE GHOST IN THE MACHINE — JUD CHARLTON & LUCY CUDDEN
25. SIP THE WINE - THE CEREMONY — NATASHA FORD
26. SPARE SOME CHANGE — KARE SILVERSTEN
27. THE WICKER MAN - IRON MAIDEN
28. SEPERATION BY SKIN (Alchemical Mix) - EARTH LAB
29. SHE’S THINKING OF ME - SIMON CALLOW & JUD CHARLTON
30. PRODUCING A MOONCHILD — MIKE SHANNON & PAUL MCDOWELL
31. BEHOLD THE PLACE I HAVE LED YOU - SIMON CALLOW
32. HYPNOTIZING BRENT - PAUL MCDOWELL, TERRENCE BAYLER & KAL WEBER
33. THE CURIOUS CAT COMES WILLINGLY - SIMON CALLOW
34. HE WAS NEVER A CARPENTER - PAUL MCDOWELL & KAL WEBER
35. MATHERS ENTERS THE SUIT - PAUL MCDOWELL & KAL WEBER
36. TIME AFTER ALL IS ONLY RELATIVE - SIMON CALLOW
37. WHERE’S THE DOOR - KAL WEBER & JAMIE LISA JACQUEMIN
38. HOLY UNION - SIMON CALLOW
39. THE LAST FIGHT (Score)
40. PRÉLUDE À L’APRÈS-MIDI D’UN FAUNE - DEBUSSY
41. FELT OUT OF PLACE - MIKE SHANNON & PAUL MCDOWELL
42. MAN OF SORROWS - BRUCE DICKINSON
You can buy the Chemical Wedding soundtrack from Amazon.com by clicking the link below:
Fan-filmed video footage of Bruce Dickinson calling out a pot-smoker in the audience during the first show of the second leg of the band’s “Somewhere Back In Time - World Tour 08″ Wednesday night (May 21) at the Verizon Wireless in San Antonio, Texas can be viewed below. “Would you please put that fucking shit out?” Dickinson can be heard saying on the tape. “My lungs are trying to work up here, dude,” he added.
Click the link below to watch a video of Bruce arriving in Cannes taken from BBC:
Metal god, actor, novelist, swordsman, pilot, DJ - and now screenwriter. IRON MAIDEN’s Bruce Dickinson is a man of many parts, and this weekend he showed up in Cannes to show off a new film called Chemical Wedding. Dickinson, a registered commercial airline pilot, flew himself to the south of France, along with a bunch of journalists, fans, and suitably attired hangers-on (they carried tote bags bearing the legend “Bruce Air Flight 666″).
There’s something very Iron Maiden about Wedding, dabbling as it does in the occult world of early-20th-century mystic Aleister Crowley, finding several excuses to liberate young women from their clothes, and incorporating dialogue that sounds as if it was lifted from the Number of the Beast’s lyric sheet. It would all be too ridiculous if Dickinson were not such a nice, unassuming chap - the 49-year-old product of a minor public school with a penchant for satanic imagery. When Dickinson sits down with Chemical Wedding director Julian Doyle (a veteran of Iron Maiden videos and Terry Gilliam’s editing room) the pair clearly get on like a house on fire. Dickinson says Chemical Wedding has been in the works for 15 years, having passed through a number of producers; in the end, he got the thing off the ground himself.
“I started getting into Aleister Crowley when I was 15,” he says. “He was the first rock star.” He adds that Chemical Wedding is “Withnail & I meets The Wicker Man”, which must have sounded good in those pitch meetings.
Without Dickinson, Chemical Wedding would have remained one of the submerged nine-tenths of gunk films clogging up the Cannes film market. Hampered by ropey performances, it never reaches the levels of weirdness and humour it is aiming at. But Dickinson, game as ever, can’t resist a final, harmless blasphemy: “We bring Crowley back for three days. Like Christ. Only better.” Get your devil-horn salute ready now.”




LONDON (Billboard), by Paul Sexton - Bruce Dickinson made his live debut with Iron Maiden at the end of 1981. He had viewed the group’s early emergence from a ringside seat as lead singer with Samson, another of the bands in what the rock press dubbed “the new wave of British heavy metal.”
Since then, he has been not only Iron Maiden’s definitive lead singer, but an author, sportsman, a solo artist for five years in the 1990s, a radio DJ and a pilot. Before the May 12 release of “Somewhere Back in Time,” a compilation of the band’s ’80s hits, and in the middle of the most successful global tour of the band’s career, which launched February 1 in Mumbai, India, he sat down with Billboard to discuss his, and Maiden’s, life and times.
Q: When you joined Maiden, how aware had you been of the band?
Bruce Dickinson: We effectively grew up together, musically, because I was in Samson, and all the bands were aware of everybody else, we all gigged together. It’s fair to say Maiden had this momentum about them. It was like standing in front of a truck. They had that energy before they got the deal (with label EMI).
Q: But that took quite a while to build, didn’t it?
Dickinson: It did, but a lot of that was Steve (Harris, bassist and founding member) trying to get the personnel right, trying to get the commitment from people. Once the deal was signed, the press leapt all over it. “Running Free” came out, and it cunningly snuck in under the radar of all the punk stuff. They must have had to restrain Steve, because he absolutely hated punk. The first album (”Iron Maiden,” 1980) went to No. 4, which was an astonishing feat for a band like that.
Q: What were the circumstances of you replacing Paul Di’anno as lead singer?
Dickinson: Things with Paul hadn’t been going terribly well, and they’d made the decision to get rid of him. So they came and took a peek at me. Clive (Burr, Maiden’s then-drummer) had been in Samson for three years, and (the album) “Killers” was being made at Zomba Studios (in northwest London), which back then was Morgan Studios.
We were in Morgan, and Maiden were in the (studio) opposite. So we used to go to the pub and have a few beers and chat. I went over and listened to the Maiden record and Clive would come over and listen to ours.
Q: Had you looked across at the band and thought, “I could do that?”
Dickinson: Oh, I did that the first time I saw Maiden play, in Camden (north London) at the Music Machine. It was like a four-act bill, we were supposed to be headlining and Maiden were third on the bill. They turned up and it was clearly their audience. Everybody left as soon as they’d finished.
I stood at the back watching and thought, “Christ, this is a great band. Imagine what I could do if I was singing with that band.”
Q: It seems as though Maiden developed a common cause because the band members were, and still are, outsiders.
Dickinson: We are still outsiders. We always will be, because that’s our essential nature. I can’t imagine what it would be like to go to vacuous showbiz parties. It’d be a nightmare. It’s just not what we’re about. The show’s the thing. Everything you need to know about Iron Maiden is onstage.
Q: How did you develop your personal stagecraft?
Dickinson: It’s one thing to project a confident air to the back of a club. It’s another to do the same thing in a theatre, then an arena, and it’s quite another thing to do it in a festival. Before the days of camera and side screens, you were just a little speck. It was a rapid learning curve.
My aim as a frontman is always to try and shrink the venue, if you can, to turn that football stadium into the world’s smallest club. At least you have to try. The essence of the Maiden experience is that we want to include everybody in it.
Q: When “The Number of the Beast” hit No. 1 on the U.K. charts in April 1982, it knocked Barbra Streisand’s “Love Songs” off the top. It was almost anti-establishment.
Dickinson: Yes, we had a bit of a history of that. With “Bring Your Daughter … to the Slaughter” (in January 1991) we did a service to the nation by knocking Sir Cliff (Richard) off the Christmas No. 1. I’m still waiting for my (royal honor as a) C.B.E. for that.
Q: You personally have always taken on challenges, whether it’s fencing, broadcasting, being an author or being a pilot.
Dickinson: That’s because I just have an insatiable curiosity about the nature of things, and I think the best way to find out about something is to try and do it. Flying wasn’t on a list. It would be awfully good from the point of view of people writing about us if there was a plan, but there isn’t.
The movie we’re just doing (”Chemical Wedding”) stems from conversations in the pub with Julian Doyle (Dickinson’s co-writer on the film and its director) 15 years ago. As it happens, we’re now having the most successful tour in the band’s history, the band is a global phenomenon, and in the same year, we get to release a feature film, followed shortly afterwards by another feature film with a documentary, DVD, all the rest of it. … It looks like a plan. It’s not. It’s totally random.
Q: So you’re probably not very good at sitting around daydreaming.
Dickinson: I’m very good at daydreaming. Ask any of my schoolteachers.
Q: In the period when you were out of the band (1993-98), did your solo work fulfill you?
Dickinson: The reason I left Maiden was that I genuinely didn’t know if I was getting that buzz anymore from doing new stuff. Nothing bad happened, there were no disagreements. The machine ran like clockwork, and that’s when I started to get really antsy.
Also, the cult status of the band meant that whatever you did, people would go, in a patronizing fashion, “Oh, nice effort.” I didn’t think they’d have any problem finding another singer, but their subsequent career path hit a few oily patches on the road.
My own career fell off a cliff, and I decided I’d have one go at completely reinventing (myself), so everybody thought I’d gone raving mad, and I came up with an album called “Skunkworks” (1996). It got great reviews, but the record company wasn’t sure.
Then I did a record called “The Chemical Wedding” (1998), which was digging really deep into territory I’d never been to before, but keeping a rock sensibility.
I think it’s fair to say it was a fairly groundbreaking album, did really well sales-wise and I could see myself having a successful global cottage industry as an artist. Clearly it was never going to rival Maiden. But at the same time, looking at Maiden, it was obvious something was going to crack.
Q: How did you develop as an artist during those solo years?
Dickinson: I was a much deeper musician by the time I got to “Chemical Wedding” than I ever was during the latter two or three albums with Maiden. I was much more serious about it. Roy Z, who was my producer and collaborator, said, “You’ve got to go back. You’ve done it, you’ve changed yourself around, it’s worked. But the world needs Iron Maiden.”
And I thought, “It does.” Then we had a meeting, myself and Steve. He was a bit leery at first. His main thing was wanting to know, if I came back, that I wasn’t going to leave again. I said, “Quite the contrary — if we glue it all back together again, we could do stuff that’s better than we ever thought possible. It could be bigger than we ever dreamed of.”
And that’s pretty much the way it’s turned out. It’s a really exciting place to be at the moment.
Q: So how would you compare Maiden now with the group of, say, 25 years ago?
Dickinson: The way we play the songs now is in many ways more powerful, it’s more under control. It’s not like somebody running so fast that their legs are running away underneath them, which is kind of what it was like in the ’80s. This is a mature runner now who knows the pace and has always got something in the tank for the sprint when it’s appropriate. We’ve reached that sweet spot.
Recent Comments